Publications

Phosphogypsum Disposal  and  The Environment  (Page 4 of 4)

With closed-circuit wet stacking, all rain falling on top of the stack can be contained in the gypsum slurry settling ponds provided that the gypsum starter dikes around the ponds have sufficient freeboard. A ditch or channel usually surrounds the stack and retains rainfall runoff contaminated from contact with non-vegetated gypsum side slopes and any lateral seepage at the toe of the stack. In wet climates, excess water in the ditch or channel, which may also serve as a process water cooling pond, is either returned to the chemical plant as process makeup water, pumped up to the top of the stack for storage, and eventually either consumed or discharged to receiving water bodies after appropriate treatment.

Treatment of excess process water, not stored and/or consumed in the process, usually consists of two-stage lime neutralization and clarification. This treatment process is expensive and requires clarification ponds in which the lime sludges are stored. The treated water is also high in dissolved solids and sulphate and sometimes ammonia, where nitrogen-based fertilizers are manufactured and not air stripped. For non-contact water that is not highly impacted, reverse osmosis can be used in lieu of liming.

The quantity of excess process water needing to be treated and discharged can usually be reduced, and possibly even eliminated, by having adequate surge capacity and by the way the gypsum stack and chemical plant are operated16. For example, amending and vegetating the bare gypsum stack slopes, can, with time, prevent rainfall from coming into contact and getting contaminated by the gypsum, thus enabling side slope runoff to be segregated and discharged off-site without treatment. Florida recently expanded its rules, which became effective in July 1999, requiring all phosphoric acid producers in the State to annually prepare and submit to the FDEP process water balances and operating and water management plans for their phosphogypsum disposal facilities.

With dry stacking, runoff from the stack can be collected on-site and consumed in the chemical process or used to wet trafficked areas to abate dusting.

Gypsum Stack Closure

When the storage capacity of a gypsum stack is exhausted or when a phosphoric acid chemical plant is permanently closed, seepage out of the stack and rainfall runoff from the slopes have to be contained on-site and/or treated before discharge. This will continue as long as water infiltrates the stack and/or until the water in the pores of the gypsum in the stack has drained out. In addition, with time, rainfall seeping into the stack will produce a network of solution cavities that could make it more expensive to cap the top of the stack at a later date.

Regrading and vegetating the side slopes, after amending the surface with dolomitic limestone if needed, may often be sufficient to prevent rainfall (and snow melt) from seeping into the slopes and allow for slope runoff to be discharged off-site without treatment. Under favorable climatic conditions and hydrogeological settings, regrading the top of a gypsum stack to promote surface runoff in combination with good vegetation and/ or a relatively impervious clay cover may be sufficient to prevent rainfall infiltration. In other situations, an impervious geosynthetic liner may be needed.

Once closure has been completed (Figure 11) and infiltration into the stack has been eliminated, the stack will continue to drain until it stops settling due to self-weight consolidation and creep, and until the moisture in the gypsum pores reaches field capacity. The time required for a closed stack to stop draining depends on the dimensions and age of the stack, the properties of the gypsum and the hydrogeological setting17. A stack on a porous foundation will drain much more rapidly than one constructed atop a low permeability clay stratum.

Conclusions

Even though considerable research has gone into finding commercial uses for phosphogypsum, more than 95 percent of the gypsum generated annually in the production of phosphoric acid using the wet process still has to be disposed of on land or in the sea. As a result, in the last 25 years, methods for constructing, operating and closing gypsum stacks and associated process water ponds have been developed that enable on-land phosphogypsum disposal to be achieved in an environmentally sound manner. New disposal facilities are being permitted and constructed and existing facilities are being retrofitted to meet stricter environmental standards.

References

1. Wissa, Anwar E. Z., Gypsum Stacking Technology, 1977 Annual Technical Meeting, Central Florida and Peninsular Sections, American Society of Chemical Engineers, Clearwater, Florida, May 1977.

2. Wissa, Anwar E. Z., and Fuleihan, Nadim F., Design and Reclamation of Phosphogypsum Disposal Sites, Advances in Phosphate Fertilizer Technology, AIChE Symposium Series 292, Volume 89, 1993.

3. Garlanger, John E., Properties of Phosphogypsum, Florida Phosphate Council Annual Meeting, February 1996.

4. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Phosphogypsum Management, Rules, F.A.C. Chapter 62-673, 1994.

5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Phosphogypsum Stacks, CFR 61, SubpartR, June 1992.

6. LaCrosse, J. P., et al, Measurement and Modeling of HF Emissions from Phosphoric Acid Production Facilities, Project 197-002, Radian Corporation, September 1993.

7. USEPA, Measurement of Fluoride Emissions from Gypsum Ponds, Contract 69-01-4145, Task No. 10 USEPA, Division of Stationary Source Enforcement, Washington, D.C., September 1978.

8. IMC Fertilizer, Inc., Application for Development Approval - Gypsum Stack Expansion, Polk County, Florida, August 1988.
9. U.S. Agri-Chemical Corporation, Application for Development Approval - Gypsum Stack Expansion, Polk County, Florida, June 1994.

10. C.F. Industries, Inc., Phosphogypsum Stack Expansion DRI , Hillsborough County, Florida, January 1996.

11. Wissa, Anwar E. Z., and Fuleihan, Nadim F., Control of Groundwater Pollution from Phosphoric Acid Waste Gypsum Stacks, Presented at Session on Phosphoric and Sulfuric Acid Pollution Abatement, AIChE Annual Meeting Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1981.

12. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Environmental Impact Statement, Central Florida Phosphate Industry, EPA 904/9-78-026a, November 1978.

13. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Quality and Hydrogeological Data for Three Phosphate Industry Waste-Disposal Sites in Central Florida, 1979-80, Water-Resources Investigations 81-84, 1981.

14. Garlanger, John E., Fuleihan, Nadim F., and Riad, Ashraf H., Leakage Rates through Geomembrane Liners Beneath Phosphogypsum Disposal Facilities, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, Singapore, 1994.

15. Fuleihan, Nadim F., and Cameron. John E., World's First Gypsum Stack Constructed on a Composite Liner - The IMC Agrico Experience, Proceedings of International Workshop on Environmental Challenges of Fertilizer Production - An Examination of Progress and Pitfalls, Sponsored by the International Fertilizer Development Center, Atlanta, Georgia, September, 1997.

16. Wissa, Anwar E. Z., and Fuleihan, Nadim F., Impacts of Phosphogypsum Stack Management on Process Water Balance, presented at Session 76, Seminar on Phosphogypsum Pond Management, AIChE Spring National; Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, April, 1986.

17. Morris, Edgar O., and Garlanger, John E., Performance of a Closed Gypsum Stack, Presented at The Fertilizer industry Round Table, Orlando, Florida, November, 1994.

previous page  
 

HomeOfficesContact Us